Category: Health


In the game of politics being played around the Gulf oil spill — the cause, the response, who’s the blame, where to drill next — it’s the wildlife that stands to lose the most.

With mid-term elections closing in, politicians are out doing their hand-shaking, baby-kissing thing. They’re also collecting campaign contributions, including nearly $14 million contributed so far, just to the 2010 election cycle, by the oil and gas industry. That kind of money says Don’t forget us when you’re in office. Unfortunately, wildlife doesn’t have the luxury of buying loyalty from representatives. That’s why Defenders of Wildlife is calling on Congress to donate all oil company campaign contributions to help save wildlife in the Gulf of Mexico.

View Full Article »

Who Killed the Climate Bill?

The climate bill is kind of like a suffering, wounded dog. You want to believe it’s for the best when it’s finally put out of its misery, except you wish it just didn’t have to go down that like that.

In an unsurprising move, Senate majority leader Harry Reid made it official this afternoon. He announced he would introduce an “admittedly narrow, limited” energy bill that contains no greenhouse gas provisions and maybe even no renewable electricity mandate. The votes, he said, just weren’t there.

“It’s easy to count to 60,” said Reid, according to Politico. “I could do it by the time I was in eighth grade. My point is this, we know where we are. We know we don’t have the votes.”

Despite tireless climate champion Sen. John Kerry’s  vague assurances that he will keep negotiating for a cap on carbon emissions at some future point in time, Democrats just gave up on the last, best chance to pass a global warming measure anytime soon.  How often does an oil spill Armageddon come along to illustrate why this matters? And the Democrat majority ain’t getting any bigger in November, that’s for sure.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world gets it. For god’s sake, even China — America’s eternally convenient climate punching bag  — is reportedly on the verge of establishing a mandatory carbon trading program by 2015.

Looking for someone to blame for this sad state of affairs? Here are a few options:

View Full Article »

If it wasn’t for Linda’s sign I would have never thought she was homeless. Can you picture this woman sleeping outside on a bench by the Santa Monica Library?

Years ago she moved to the San Fernando Valley with her boyfriend looking for work. He was a union welder for 30 years. The work ended and because of health issues they ended up homeless.

Together they have collected unemployment benefits, food stamps, Social Security and disability payments but now they’re separated so she has to resort to panhandling to make ends meet.


That’s Funny, She Doesn’t Look Homeless

Some seriously nasty toxins, including arsenic, chromium, mercury, and lead, can be found in coal ash, the highly toxic leftover of burning coal for energy. But even in the wake of 2008’s catastrophic failure of a Tennessee storage pond, which released an ash-laden flood in the path of hundreds of homes, U.S. EPA is still seriously debating whether to put in stricter regulations.

Currently, the agency is accepting public comments on whether or not it should finally regulate coal ash as the hazardous substance that it obviously is. (Sign our petition to tell EPA that coal ash is hazardous.) But before it could do that, EPA had to quit promoting a permissive coal ash recycling program, which a hazardous designation could in part end.

Earlier this month, the EPA took down a web page an industry partnership program that promoted the reuse of coal ash in products ranging from consumer goods and building materials to soil treatments for farms. On the one hand, recycling makes sense: Coal ash is the nation’s second largest waste stream (right behind the waste generated by coal mining itself, actually.) If we have to do something with all that waste then some of the recycling options, for instance as a replacement for cement in concrete, are good ways to safely lock away the toxins.

On the other hand, many other reuses make no sense whatsoever and can lead to severe health and environmental problems. Ash, for example, is being used in drywall in people’s homes, for example, and as fill dirt in construction projects, where it can contaminate groundwater.

View Full Article »

Six Degrees of Bob McDonnell

Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell (R) is no friend to the LGBT community. He is, however, related to it — and that points to an important truth about our society and our approach to LGBT rights.

As a legislator, McDonnell was chief sponsor and author of a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex couples from marriage. McDonnell’s Web site proudly boasts that he was twice named “Legislator of the Year” by the Virginia Family Foundation, an ultra-conservative group. As governor, in February 2010, he signed an executive order banning discrimination against state workers on the basis of race, sex, religion and age — but not sexual orientation, as his predecessors had done. A month later, after much criticism, he issued an executive directive (not as strong as an executive order), saying that he would not tolerate discrimination of any kind, including that based on sexual orientation. And his Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli forced the halt of a proposed state regulatory change that would have allowed government employees to add same-sex partners to their state health benefits.

McDonnell’s former in-law, however — the divorced spouse of his wife’s sister — is transgender. In April, at an LGBT-rights rally held by Equality Virginia, she announced to the crowd, “I am father to three of the present governor’s nephews and nieces.” She said she wants to use her association with the governor to advance LGBT rights, especially because she fears her personal situation may have “hardened” some of his views.

The Washington Post has a long piece today on Deane, and reports that several LGBT activists are skeptical of Deane’s motives. Sen. A. Donald McEachin (D-Richmond), an advocate of LGBT rights, told WaPo that “several activists have told him they are worried that Deane will shift attention from the cause to her,” and that “It’s incumbent to all of us to keep the issue front and center. The more all of us do to speak out about the issue, the more it becomes about the issue.”

Wait just a minute. The “issue” here is civil rights — and civil rights are about people. One cannot separate them from the people whom they affect.

View Full Article »

Tracy Clarke-Flory on Salon’s Broadsheet calls attention to a new television ad campaign in Scotland that takes on the myth that a woman is “asking for it” head on, with a healthy dose of mockery. The “Not Ever” campaign by Rape Crisis Scotland takes its inspiration for the 30-second spot from a government survey conducted this February that found that 17% of Scots believe that a woman wearing “revealing clothing” is “partly, mostly or totally to blame for being raped.” (I’ve given away the answer to one of their quiz questions.)


View Full Article »

There’s a rash of shark attacks happening throughout the world’s oceans. But here’s the real problem: It’s the sharks who are the victims.

Due to an increased global demand for the fish’s meat, shark populations have seriously plummeted in recent years. According to Oceana, more than 100 million sharks are killed every year for their meat, oftentimes through “finning,” a brutal process where fishermen cut off sharks’ fins and throw their bodies into the ocean to die. In other cases, sharks get trapped and killed as bycatch during longline tuna fishing. Some species of shark have declined by as much as 99 percent. Sharks may reign at the top of the ocean’s food chain, but the fish’s survival is nothing short of precarious.

The severity of the shark situation is well-documented, yet stores and restaurants across the world still serve up shark meat. Even Henry’s Farmers Markets, a grocery store chain, sells shark meat, despite the store’s supposed commitment to providing products that “support a healthy lifestyle.” I’ve got news for you, Henry’s: Shark meat isn’t healthy for people, and it sure as heck isn’t healthy for ocean ecosystems.

View Full Article »

No Quarry!

????????????????????????????????????? ?The Issue
?The only coastal-inland wildlife linkage remaining in Southern California is in danger of becoming?one giant, dusty?hole in the ground, thanks to?an enormous aggregate pit-mine?due to be installed soon, by?the equally enormous Granite Construction Corporation.
???????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????The Story
?The property chosen for the mine is part of?the only coastal-to-inland wildlife corridoor of Southern California, yet? twelve additional Riverside County sites are?available.? The?corridoor is essential for the continuation of both local wildlife and?animals that migrate through the area. It enables?wildlife to safely go from coastal and inland ecosystems without?danger impended by industrial?issues.?
?The property was?to be purchased?by the adjacent Santa Margarita
Ecological Reserve?to complete the corridoor. Then Granite came around.????????
?
?A little background on?the Granite Construction Corporation:
There are over fifty pit mines and quarries in Riverside County alone, and the majority of them are, you guessed it, Granite's.??
?In fact,? seven miles south of the currently proposed site for the Liberty quarry is?Rosemary's Mountain?Quarry, which is operated by Granite.?

?Rosemary's?Quarry produces approximately one-million tons of aggregate annually.
????
?Granite has a history of creating pit mines for aggregate. And?quite?a history in Oregon; the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality?
recently fined Granite for polluting?the watershed of that state.?
?What would stop them from doing the same to our watershed???
????
?The Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is in the midst of the?Santa Margarita Valley.? Nestled?near the?cities of Fallbrook, Murrieta, Rainbow, and?Temecula, the Valley is a welcome retreat from fast-paced city life,?and?is one of the last pristine places in the area.? The?Valley is also home to the Santa Margarita River – one of the?very few free-flowing rivers of Southern California.??
?
?The local Luiseno Indians?are opposed to the quarry. The site is
considered sacred to tribal members, and said to?have artifacts important?to their cultural heritage.??Their voice has thus far been ignored.
?
?Native residents, homeowners, schools, doctors, entire cities, and?nearly 8oo local companies and bussinesses are opposed to the Quarry as well.
?Their opinions don't count, apparently.??
???
?????????????????????????????? The Consequences?
The objective of this?quarry is to mine as much aggregate from the 414 acre site as possible by any means possible.
?The difference between this mine and others??This time, an entire mountain?needs to be taken down and broken up to acquire that aggregate. That means using 10,000 pounds of explosives per blast, per day. Twenty hours a day, six days a week(minemum). For seventy-five years. ?There is also the 310 gallons of fresh, clean water that will be used?per minute to manufacture the aggregate. That adds up to 86,000 gallons per day, or roughly 2,028,233,000 gallons?over the course of the mines 75-year?lifetime.
??Not to mention the huge trucks (needed to take the aggregate to buyers) that will clog the i15 freeway?even more than it already is. Oh, and the extra diesel soot as a byproduct of all those trucks.?
??
? It will also create sillicate dust to pollute the air. That sillicate will be carried on the breeze at least?fifty miles in all directions from the?
quarry site.?Residents, both human and not,?will suffer respiratory problems as a result of the toxic nature of sillicate.? The dust will settle over and smother anything in its path.
???
?? Even Granite's own environmental report admits there will be substantial ecological consequences?to the?area surrounding the mine.?
????
?? The Riverside County Board of Supervisors is considering?approval of??this? monstrous pit mine to increase revenue and create jobs. Every?concern over the impacts -?environmental, cultural, residential -?of this?quarry?have thus far been ignored.???

?Of course, it will create?jobs.? But at what cost?
???
??With so much aggregate already being mined from?Rosemary's Quarry,?within such a close proximity?to the Liberty Quarry,?is yet another pit mine really needed??
??
?What is more important? Economy? Or preserving?our cultural heritage, our right to health as residents, and our?scarce SouthernCalifornia?coastal-inland??habitat???
???????????????????????????????? You decide.?
??

No Quarry!

Save the forests!

Do you enjoy the fact of knowing hundreds of animals are dying every minute by eating the poisonous plants in forests? Every second of the day somewhere in the world, lumberjacks are cutting down good wood and plants that are healthy and natural to the animals, when, trhey could be cutting down poisonous plants to animals yet not humans. FOR THE GOOD OF HEALTHY PLANTS!
Save the forests!

Save the forests!

Do you enjoy the fact of knowing hundreds of animals are dying every minute by eating the poisonous plants in forests? Every second of the day somewhere in the world, lumberjacks are cutting down good wood and plants that are healthy and natural to the animals, when, trhey could be cutting down poisonous plants to animals yet not humans. FOR THE GOOD OF HEALTHY PLANTS!
Save the forests!

Powered by WordPress. Theme: Motion by 85ideas.