Tag Archive: answers


The United States must change its immigration policies to exclude sociopaths.

Sociopaths are dangerous to society. Not all of them want to do violence, but all of them lack empathy for others and so cannot help themselves but to take advantage of non-sociopaths wherever they go.

This does not refer to some “extreme” or “radical” form of sociopaths. Common, everyday sociopaths can wreak destruction in the personal lives of those they know.

When sociopaths move into any country, a certain percentage of them start doing horrible things.

There may be plenty of sociopaths who reject their own inherent destructive nature, but we have no way to determine who does and who does not. We could ask them on their immigration application, but we cannot trust their answers. They have no emotional motivation to tell the truth.

We should not take the chance, at least until we find some way to determine which sociopaths reject their own destructive tendencies.

Does this seem extreme? It’s not as unreasonable as it might seem. We already choose who can immigrate and who cannot. We make the rules. This is our country, after all. We are not under any obligation to allow anyone to immigrate just because they want to. They do it with our blessing or they don’t do it.

So this policy would simply add a new distinction to the already-existing immigration criteria.

The first criticism of this policy will probably be, “It is supremacist.” It is saying that we, the non-sociopaths, are better than sociopaths. But sociopaths are dangerous to non-sociopaths, so this proposed policy is nothing more than informed, reasonable self-preservation. If there is a group of any kind with an established intent to harm others, it would be self-destructive to grant entry to their members.

Let us do the smart thing and stop sociopaths from immigrating to the United States. Join with us and sign this petition. And then urge everyone you know to sign it.
Stop Sociopaths From Immigrating to the United States

It’s a liberal faux pas to be against welfare. How could you be against helping millions of struggling women and children? That’s just wrong, right?

Well, I’m against welfare. Welfare as we know it, that is.

I have no problem with the helping part. Unlike many I’ve heard from, I think human beings are morally obligated to help each other, and I don’t mind my tax dollars going towards struggling families. In fact, I may be one of the few Americans who wouldn’t mind paying a few more tax dollars if I knew it meant more kids could go to the doctor when they were sick or never went hungry. That’s the kind of stuff I think money is for, and when it’s automatically deducted from my paycheck, my silly desires for a new thing at Target don’t get in the way of that happening.

What I hate is TANF. That’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or what we commonly refer to as a welfare check. It sucks. Before reform, after reform — whatever. It pulls families deeper into poverty by establishing stupid rules that make families choose between today’s rent check and their future financial security.

View Full Article »

Powered by WordPress. Theme: Motion by 85ideas.