Tag Archive: Economy


In just a couple of months, the Department of Education (DOE) will release a decision about their “gainful employment” (GE) rule. In the 60-day comment period, they received 83,000 comments about the rule — the highest ever for a higher education rulemaking.

Here’s why: This rule is particularly devastating for African American populations and under-served communities. It would limit the amount of federal financial aid given to populations that had slower pay-back rates or were likely to have longer periods of debt – specifically the people that need financial aid.


Millions of people attend career colleges every year, and many need financial assistance to do so. Isn’t the purpose of financial aid to help those who cannot afford to pay for it themselves? Why would we take that opportunity away?


Add your voice to the 83,000 people who have already taken action. Tell the DOE that the GE rule is unfair and will have devastating results for our economy.
Don’t Leave Underserved Populations Out of Higher Ed!

The Politics of War

Everyone on the planet seems to know Christine O’Donnell’s thoughts on masturbation. She headed an “Anti-masturbation campaign” and spoke about it on MTV in 1996 on the television show “Sex in the 90’s”. Christine – who is running for Senator in the state of Delaware – has been a “gift” to comedians across the country as they debate on stage whether or not she was a “witch” (as she proclaimed on Bill Maher’s “Politically Incorrect”).  As a comic, I am grateful to Christine for all that she has done to create laughs for this great country, but Christine is not the only political candidate in this mid-term election who appears to be more fiction than substance.

Sadly, most candidates are lacking in substance and their campaign ads are more likely to tell what is wrong with their opponent instead of where they stand on the issues. I live in Los Angeles where the airwaves are full of campaign attack ads throughout most of the day. All the commercials show an out of focus bad picture of the opponent with horrible music and a few sound bites with a cheesy voice-over. Missing from all of these ads are the candidates’ platform and their stance on real issues.

The most important issues to voters in these elections are the economy, healthcare and the deficit. Large numbers of Americans are still out of work and it is a daily struggle to put food on the table. People are losing their jobs, their homes and their healthcare in one fell swoop and sometimes it seems like Washington, D.C is “printing money on demand.” I share these concerns with voters but I also have another worry – the wars.

View Full Article »

Dear fellow Humans,

It is now clear, that the greatest threat to mankind and Earth itself comes from overpopulation, which is growing at an exponential rateas underlined in a recent UN Study: Slower Population Growth To Help Environment

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j74yWpJ1atBwCsu78IVj2VOABDzg

?

As we all well know, the population of a given country is to be considered in relation with the available territory, the resources, the state of, interaction with and impact on the environment, the flora and fauna, and this all with regards to the modes of social and economic productions and the standard of life, which are therethrough responsibly achieved or made potentially realizable.
This is as true as the fact, that this planet forms a rather homogeneous eco-system, wherein not only all the elements are interdependent and interconnected, but also one, in which each of these elements is equally important and necessary to the preservation of the whole.
Human societies are not exempt from these natural principles and in the current world view and international practice, whereby the notions of integration and globalization are the motto, it is practically impossible to render proper measure of overpopulation in national or regional terms or to approach it exclusively in such a context. No country is an exception.

Overpopulation is a worldwide issue.
Overpopulation is an all-human tragedy and, as such, it requires a worldwide understanding and solution.
The situation may of course differ from one country to another, but this does not substantially change the global picture, for, also the less overpopulated areas would eventually face it and taste it through immigration and the effects of overpopulation on the overall state of the climate, the environment, the resources and the globalized economy as well as on world peace and stability.
Besides, without tackling overpopulation, all measures, which would be taken to ensure the growth of the economy and provide a given population of a given country with a higher quality of life, would only be postponing, shoving the problem onto future generations?? -? as if “killing our grandchildren to feed our children.”, to quote one wise man.

Overpopulation and its consequences on our evolution and our security as well as on the sustainability of this planet?are definitely a source of great concern: there are just too many of us? -? think of the amount of garbage alone, which seven billion Humans produce! Daily.

It is also obvious, that our planet is subject to far-reaching changes.
The consequences of these changes could be catastrophic, if we do not re-adjust our ways of thinking and doing, also with regards to reproduction and population.

Our world is extremely overpopulated; our legitimate demands of food, energy, water and other goods of first necessity weigh heavily on the available resources, the environment, the flora and fauna. This is no longer sustainable.

?

A worldwide, rational, responsible, democratic ( applicable and mandatory to each and all! ), scientific and rigorously monitored Birth Control is the only logical, mature and ethical answer to this unprecedented, but largely foreseen challenge.

?

Some, however, speak of free energy, as the ultimate remedy to this crisis.
Truly, technology alone is not a panacea in human matters.
Lasting food security, development in sustainability thus, could hardly be realized without absorbing into the equation the determining factor of human population and its diverse legitimate demands, both of which will be growing exponentially.

?

Others may still say, “multiply yourself” orders The Bible.
Genesis 1:22: “God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.”.”

Well, we certainly shall argue here, that reason is also given to us, so that we can know, judge and decide when we ‘have multiplied enough’.

And again, the Commandment could have as well been: “multiply yourself with wisdom and reason and humaneness and knowledge and care and management.”
Besides, if we keep procreating the way we now do, there wouldn’t be much animals, fish, trees, “birds” left “on the earth”!

Overpopulation has indeed a deeper spiritual dimension and, besides,? the following summary makes convincingly the case for a serious struggle against overpopulation, even if one is to consider?the issue?from a solely practical point of view:

Fewer Humans = smaller petroleum demand = less carbon dioxide/monoxide produced by cars and industry

Fewer Humans = reduced food demand = fewer trees cut down for farmland (e.g. Brazilian rainforest)

Fewer Humans = reduced demand for everything which results in a reduced price/cost for everything (education, well-being, housing, energy, food…)

?

We are already causing drastic climate change; species are going extinct and fellow Humans are starving to death en masse which means that the population is obviously already too high.

?

Do please endorse us and most importantly, do strongly advocate a rational, democratic and scientific birth control, at home and abroad; empower Women, add your influential voice to ours, help us promote a humane and just solution to this tragedy!

?

?

Thank you and may reason and wisdom prevail.

Overpopulation Awareness & Birth Control

A woman named Patricia Reid was recently profiled in the New York Times. She has been unemployed for four years. Before being cut loose in massive layoffs, she worked for two decades as an internal auditor and analyst at Boeing. The biggest fear for this 57-year-old college graduate? “Becoming a bag lady.”

“Bag lady” is my generation’s term for “homeless old woman with everything she owns stuffed in two big shopping bags.” It is a position that women, regardless of age, marital status, employment or resources, fear. It summons up visions of a “living death,” of tottering down a grimy street pushing a shopping cart, dragging our eco-friendly cloth shopping bags crammed to their cloth brim with fat-free cookies, a blanket with a torn satin edging, a stuffed animal, flannel pajamas and unread copies of supermarket tabloids. Don’t laugh. I asked several women just exactly what they envisioned would be IN those bags. That’s what they told me they thought they might need if they wanted to pass the night on the street in comfort. Obviously they’ve never given serious thought to what it truly means to be homeless.

I’ve found that for the middle-to-upper class, “bag lady” is a euphemistic way of saying “homeless.” It conveys slightly more pity than “homeless” because the stereotype doesn’t include addiction of any kind, only the sheer, oppressing poverty that frightens middle-aged women living in suburbia (and maybe a little mental illness). “Bag lady” is a step above homeless because it seems more like a specter in the night than a real possibility.

View Full Article »

Looking for some cupcakes or cookies with rainbow frosting on them, to celebrate National Coming Out Day? Don’t head to Just Cookies in Indianapolis. The bakery, inside Indianapolis’ City Market, refused to accept an order from a gay student group at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Why?

According to the man who owns the bakery, rainbow cupcakes and cookies celebrating LGBT pride violate the values of the bakery.

“I explained we’re a family-run business, we have two young, impressionable daughters and we thought maybe it was best not to do that,” said co-owner David Stockton to a local Fox television station. He then added that it’s his bakery’s decision to decide what is obscene. Apparently rainbow colors fall under that label. “We have our values, and you know, some things … for instance, if someone wants a cookie with an obscenity, well, we’re not going to do that.”

All of a sudden making cookies and cupcakes for a gay student group is against family values? So much for customer service, and so much for making a good impression on those daughters, who were just shown by their parents that discrimination can come in the form of baked goods. Meanwhile, the Indianapolis City Market has a mission to enrich “the city’s economy, expands its educational options, enhances its culture.” Having vendors that refuse to serve LGBT customers doesn’t do any of that.

View Full Article »

The Not-So-Sweet Side of Honey

Tonight marks the start of Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. For those who aren’t familiar, honey plays a big role in the holiday tradition: Apples are dipped in honey to ring in a sweet new year.

Honey, of course, comes from bees. Though not the cuddliest members of the animal kingdom, they’re still animals (although the vegan community is divided on the question of eating honey). Whether you’re an omnivore or on the anti-honey side of the vegan debate, unless you eat a strictly local diet, commercial beekeeping plays a role in your life.

The “liquid gold” only accounts for a small percentage of the bee economy; in the U.S., honeybees are primarily used to cultivate plant production, including fruit, vegetables and nuts. You may imagine bees freely coming and going from hives, pollinating nearby crops and keeping ecosystems healthy. On a local level, that’s true. But in a world of concentrated animal feeding operations and genetically modified crops, Big Ag has managed to make the poor little honeybee just another cog in the factory farm system.

View Full Article »

Women saving the environment is one of my favorite topics. So, you’d think I’d be really happy to see this weekend’s Washington Post piece about Diane MacEachern of Big Green Purse. A longtime environmentalist, she’s also an entrepreneur and public speaker with a few best-selling books under her belt. Cool, right?

But lately, she focuses on one thing that basically drives me up the wall. As the Post explains it, MacEachern “started a campaign on her website encouraging women to join the ‘One in a Million’ initiative by pledging to shift $1,000 of their household budgets to green products and services.” Much like the books she’s authored on the subject, her BGP website encourages women to “go green” with tips about buying less bottled water, eating less meat, having an eco-friendly Halloween, and demanding to receive fewer catalogs in the mail.

Is this Chicken Soup for the Wannabe Sustainable Soul? How many poor women who barely scraping by can think about buying “green” products in this economy and too many catalogs in their mailbox? How few of us have a grand lying around for our “household budget?” Buying fair trade chocolate and worrying about “responsible investing” are some of the most underwhelming options available when faced with melting polar ice caps, but promoting a so-called “eco-lifestyle” is really only the beginning of my frustration.

There are several serious flaws in MacEachern’s strategy to green the world. In my mind, it isn’t about pressuring companies to sell more eco-friendly products, though that’s certainly one part of a larger environmentalism strategy. But what we oughta be doing instead is something much more simple: quit buying stuff and quit hoarding. There is life after shopping.

View Full Article »

This weekend we celebrate Independence Day. For those of you absorbed in your beer and barbecue, this is the day the original American colonies broke free from British oppression and claimed their right to pursue happiness based on the principles of liberty and democracy.

The time has come, my fellow Americans, for another Declaration of Independence. But this time it’s not some distant king jeopardizing our future, it’s the dirty energy sources of the past. Fossil fuel companies have a tyrannical stranglehold on our national energy policy. So this Independence Day, let’s declare our independence from fossil fuels.

View Full Article »

No Quarry!

????????????????????????????????????? ?The Issue
?The only coastal-inland wildlife linkage remaining in Southern California is in danger of becoming?one giant, dusty?hole in the ground, thanks to?an enormous aggregate pit-mine?due to be installed soon, by?the equally enormous Granite Construction Corporation.
???????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????The Story
?The property chosen for the mine is part of?the only coastal-to-inland wildlife corridoor of Southern California, yet? twelve additional Riverside County sites are?available.? The?corridoor is essential for the continuation of both local wildlife and?animals that migrate through the area. It enables?wildlife to safely go from coastal and inland ecosystems without?danger impended by industrial?issues.?
?The property was?to be purchased?by the adjacent Santa Margarita
Ecological Reserve?to complete the corridoor. Then Granite came around.????????
?
?A little background on?the Granite Construction Corporation:
There are over fifty pit mines and quarries in Riverside County alone, and the majority of them are, you guessed it, Granite's.??
?In fact,? seven miles south of the currently proposed site for the Liberty quarry is?Rosemary's Mountain?Quarry, which is operated by Granite.?

?Rosemary's?Quarry produces approximately one-million tons of aggregate annually.
????
?Granite has a history of creating pit mines for aggregate. And?quite?a history in Oregon; the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality?
recently fined Granite for polluting?the watershed of that state.?
?What would stop them from doing the same to our watershed???
????
?The Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is in the midst of the?Santa Margarita Valley.? Nestled?near the?cities of Fallbrook, Murrieta, Rainbow, and?Temecula, the Valley is a welcome retreat from fast-paced city life,?and?is one of the last pristine places in the area.? The?Valley is also home to the Santa Margarita River – one of the?very few free-flowing rivers of Southern California.??
?
?The local Luiseno Indians?are opposed to the quarry. The site is
considered sacred to tribal members, and said to?have artifacts important?to their cultural heritage.??Their voice has thus far been ignored.
?
?Native residents, homeowners, schools, doctors, entire cities, and?nearly 8oo local companies and bussinesses are opposed to the Quarry as well.
?Their opinions don't count, apparently.??
???
?????????????????????????????? The Consequences?
The objective of this?quarry is to mine as much aggregate from the 414 acre site as possible by any means possible.
?The difference between this mine and others??This time, an entire mountain?needs to be taken down and broken up to acquire that aggregate. That means using 10,000 pounds of explosives per blast, per day. Twenty hours a day, six days a week(minemum). For seventy-five years. ?There is also the 310 gallons of fresh, clean water that will be used?per minute to manufacture the aggregate. That adds up to 86,000 gallons per day, or roughly 2,028,233,000 gallons?over the course of the mines 75-year?lifetime.
??Not to mention the huge trucks (needed to take the aggregate to buyers) that will clog the i15 freeway?even more than it already is. Oh, and the extra diesel soot as a byproduct of all those trucks.?
??
? It will also create sillicate dust to pollute the air. That sillicate will be carried on the breeze at least?fifty miles in all directions from the?
quarry site.?Residents, both human and not,?will suffer respiratory problems as a result of the toxic nature of sillicate.? The dust will settle over and smother anything in its path.
???
?? Even Granite's own environmental report admits there will be substantial ecological consequences?to the?area surrounding the mine.?
????
?? The Riverside County Board of Supervisors is considering?approval of??this? monstrous pit mine to increase revenue and create jobs. Every?concern over the impacts -?environmental, cultural, residential -?of this?quarry?have thus far been ignored.???

?Of course, it will create?jobs.? But at what cost?
???
??With so much aggregate already being mined from?Rosemary's Quarry,?within such a close proximity?to the Liberty Quarry,?is yet another pit mine really needed??
??
?What is more important? Economy? Or preserving?our cultural heritage, our right to health as residents, and our?scarce SouthernCalifornia?coastal-inland??habitat???
???????????????????????????????? You decide.?
??

No Quarry!

As third richest person on the planet, Warren Buffett’s no stranger to making headlines. In 2006, he pledged to give away 99 percent of his money to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In 2008, he became, for a brief time, the world’s richest man, dethroning the illustrious Gates himself. Now, with $47 billion at his disposal, Buffett’s at it again.

In a letter to Fortune this morning, the legendary investor admitted that the source of his mind-blowing wealth wasn’t a lifetime of grueling labor or sacrifice. Instead, he attributed his larger-than-life bank account to “a combination of living in America, some lucky genes, and compound interest” — along with a volatile economic system.

“My luck,” Buffett explained, “was accentuated by my living in a market system that sometimes produces distorted results, though overall it serves our country well.” (That caveat could certainly be debated, especially in the midst of a crippling recession, but his overall message is well-appreciated.)

Buffett’s exposition of America’s capitalist system flies in the face of conventional, meritocratic wisdom: “I’ve worked in an economy that rewards someone who saves the lives of others on a battlefield with a medal, rewards a great teacher with thank-you notes from parents, but rewards those who can detect the mispricing of securities with sums reaching into the billions,” he wrote. “In short, fate’s distribution of long straws is wildly capricious.”

In a seeming effort to pay penance for reaping the benefits of this unfair economic system, Buffett and Bill Gates recently launched “The Giving Pledge,” an unprecedented effort to encourage hundreds of other billionaires to donate at least 50 percent of their wealth to charity.

View Full Article »

Powered by WordPress. Theme: Motion by 85ideas.