Tag Archive: immigration


On a September morning, just before dawn, ICE came knocking on Fredd Reyes’ door. It was 5 am and Fredd was asleep after a long night of studying for his exam at Guilford Technical Community College that very same day. Instead of taking his exam, Fredd was rudely awakened from his sleep, handcuffed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and taken from his North Carolina home to North Georgia Detention Center. He was then transferred to the Stewart Detention center in Lumpkin, Georgia, which is quite infamous for corrupt and inhumane immigrant detention practices.

Twenty-two years ago, Fredd’s family fled their native Guatemala in the face of death threats and persecution. Needless to say, they haven’t been back since. Despite the clear danger they faced back in Guatemala, an immigration judge denied their bid for asylum in 2000.

Fredd worked hard and earned his Associates Degree from Davidson County Community College and transferred to Guilford Tech to continue his education. As a result, he is eligible for the federal DREAM Act, which would give undocumented youth like him a pathway to citizenship, expected to come up for a vote in the House and Senate before the end of this year. Fredd aspires to utilize his acting and singing skills to become a professional actor and renowned singer, and he’s quite good (see video below). He is neither a criminal nor a threat to this country, and completely undeserving of detention, let alone deportation from the only country he calls his home.

View Full Article »

The United States must change its immigration policies to exclude sociopaths.

Sociopaths are dangerous to society. Not all of them want to do violence, but all of them lack empathy for others and so cannot help themselves but to take advantage of non-sociopaths wherever they go.

This does not refer to some “extreme” or “radical” form of sociopaths. Common, everyday sociopaths can wreak destruction in the personal lives of those they know.

When sociopaths move into any country, a certain percentage of them start doing horrible things.

There may be plenty of sociopaths who reject their own inherent destructive nature, but we have no way to determine who does and who does not. We could ask them on their immigration application, but we cannot trust their answers. They have no emotional motivation to tell the truth.

We should not take the chance, at least until we find some way to determine which sociopaths reject their own destructive tendencies.

Does this seem extreme? It’s not as unreasonable as it might seem. We already choose who can immigrate and who cannot. We make the rules. This is our country, after all. We are not under any obligation to allow anyone to immigrate just because they want to. They do it with our blessing or they don’t do it.

So this policy would simply add a new distinction to the already-existing immigration criteria.

The first criticism of this policy will probably be, “It is supremacist.” It is saying that we, the non-sociopaths, are better than sociopaths. But sociopaths are dangerous to non-sociopaths, so this proposed policy is nothing more than informed, reasonable self-preservation. If there is a group of any kind with an established intent to harm others, it would be self-destructive to grant entry to their members.

Let us do the smart thing and stop sociopaths from immigrating to the United States. Join with us and sign this petition. And then urge everyone you know to sign it.
Stop Sociopaths From Immigrating to the United States

Given the nationwide tension behind immigration reform, many people may not agree with this statement, but it is time for budget cuts within the U.S. Immigration Services sector.

On June 22, the AP broke what should be a significant story to very little attention; most media outlets simply reprinted the brief report. “CSC gets $25M gov’t records task order,” read the headline. The $25 million order allows CSC to perform scanning, indexing, and records management for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Good for them right? Well not really. Further investigation shows that CSC — Computer Sciences Corporation — has a long history of “winning” government contracts. Yet the disastrous state of the immigration system suggests that we’re not getting what we pay for.

According to the company timeline, starting in May of 1961 with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory contract, CSC has won billions in government contracts, including services for every U.S. Armed Forces division, NASA, the IRS, and major airports; Medi-Cal and Medicare claims processing; and even processing claims when natural disasters strike. In cases where CSC has not won the contracts, CSC often buys the companies that do, like DynCorp, which they acquired in March of 2003.

Through DynCorp, CSC was able to profit from a $50 million contract to support law enforcement functions in Iraq and a $200 million contract extension from the U.S. Postal services. With every awarded contract, CSC’s goal is eerily similar: to modernize the respected agencies technology capabilities with innovative concepts such as outsourcing so they can focus on their tasks. So what, this is America and we reward innovation, right? And what does it have to do with immigration reform?

What happened to rewarding competition? CSC has long had been profiting from contracts with divisions of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and USCIS.

View Full Article »

Powered by WordPress. Theme: Motion by 85ideas.