Tag Archive: park


We appeal to the government of Armenia to immediately halt construction of a dolphinarium in Komitas Park in Yerevan. The confinement of dolphins in this facility would be both inhumane and illegal. Many important Armenian figures are buried at the park therefore a dolphinarium at this site would also be culturally inappropriate.

It is our understanding that four bottlenose dolphins will be imported from Ukraine for the facility. Bottlenose dolphins are listed in Ukraine%u2019s Red Book of endangered animals and plants. We oppose the capture and confinement of cetaceans for the purpose of public entertainment.

During capture and confinement, which is often a violent affair, these wild marine mammals suffer shock and stress due to the manner in which they are ripped from their natural, dynamic, ecologically rich surroundings and housed in enclosed, sterile, unnatural environments. Dolphins in captivity often suffer from ulcers and act out aggressively towards conspecifics and humans. Captive dolphins have been injured and even killed in such interactions and people, including experienced trainers, have been injured.

Dolphins are wild animals and like other cetaceans, are highly intelligent, sentient creatures with complex societies. They use a form of biosonar, but in captivity their sonar bounces off the walls of their small, concrete tanks. Once confined in aquarium-type exhibits, the animals are not only denied their freedom, but they are also prevented from carrying out natural behaviors such as roaming over 40 miles per day, catching live prey and interacting with their pod mates.

The climate of Armenia is absolutely not suitable for dolphins or any other foreign marine life. Armenia has very hot, dry summers and harsh winters. Additionally the altitude of Armenia is drastically higher than that of Ukraine. These climatic and geographical factors could be very dangerous for the health of the dolphins and other marine mammals. It is impossible to meet the needs of dolphins in captivity generally, and in the proposed dolphinarium in Yerevan particularly.

In the case of the Komitas Park facility, the dolphins would share a meager tank – five meters deep and with a radius of 18 meters %u2013 with one sea lion and two seals. This is unacceptable, as it will undoubtedly adversely affect the mental and physical health of the animals.

Finally, we are disappointed that a project with the dolphin importer, Nerum Company, whose activities are highly controversial and possibly even illegal in Ukraine, was allowed to proceed. Many of the dolphins in Ukrainian facilities are believed not to have the proper documentation. These animals should have never received clearance for shipment to Armenia.

We urge Armenia to keep dolphin tanks out of the country and join the list of countries, including Chile, Cyprus and Costa Rica, who have taken a stand against such facilities. Keeping dolphins is very controversial worldwide for the reasons stated above; therefore, introducing such a facility in Armenia will bring negative international attention to the country. We therefore implore Armenia to consider the welfare of the dolphins, as well as the reputation of the country, and to immediately halt plans for a dolphin center in Yerevan.?

?

?


Keep Dolphin Tanks out of Armenia

Fairfax County, the largest, most prosperous county in northern Virginia (which borders Washington, D.C.) has been turning its public parks into hunting grounds for bow hunters. After sneaking plans past public scrutiny, the Park Authority initiated bow hunting in Colvin Run Mill Park and is expanding it to other Fairfax County Parks without permission of the public/residents in the county.
Bow hunting is dangerous, extremely inhumane, and unpredictable. Visitors to the parks and residents in the surrounding area can be injured by this brutal activity.
Even the “best” bow hunters seldom kill the deer immediately. The hunter waits 45 minutes or more for the deer to run, bleed out and become exhausted. Then the hunter attempts to follow the blood trail to find the deer and kill him or her, possibly in front of children or other visitors to the park. This exposes children and adults to extraordinary animal cruelty.

Bow hunters have a high rate of injuring, rather than killing deer, as seen in the photo posted. This leaves the deer to die a slow and agonizing death. There is no way to know how far a wounded deer will run, if or when she will die, or where her final suffering will occur. Deer sometimes scream when in pain. Local bow hunters have expressed delight at such suffering. Is this really what we want in our community?

Bowhunting and other forms of hunting increase deer-vehicle collisions, since the deer flee from the hunters once they are wounded or frightened and in a desperate attempt to escape often run into roads. A recent study by Erie Insurance Company in Pennsylvania concluded that the rate of collisions between deer and vehicles increased three to four times during hunting season.

Our representatives need to understand that the following methods have proven to decrease deer-vehicle collisions significantly, some as much as 100%. Here is a list of highly effective methods for deer and wildlife management, including methods involving technology that can be used to prevent deer-vehicle collisions.

Alternatives that Fairfax County hasn’t even considered implementing:
- Patented roadside deer warning system (80% decrease in deer-vehicle collisions in several states including MN)
- Advanced warning signs
- Roadside reflectors (100% success rate, installed on Telegraph road but purchase of reflectors discontinued by county)
- Noise/Sound/Whistle devices, sprinkler systems or sound systems with motion sensors for gardens
- Fencing
- Wildlife crossings, culverts, overpasses, underpasses
- Vegetation control
- Reduced speed limits
- Smell pots
- Motion detector/light beam systems
- Immunocontraception

Over-population of deer is often blamed for deer-vehicle collisions (DVCs).? Killing the deer will not decrease the incidence of DVCs. The HSUS states “Deer culling programs generate an endless succession of removal and replacement in which animals die unnecessarily while the root causes of problems go unaddressed. As long as attractive habitat remains, other deer from surrounding areas will move in to occupy the newly vacant niche resulting in a perpetual kill cycle.”

It is also important for us to understand that deer do not “carry” or “spread” Lyme disease nor do they increase the likelihood of your contracting it. In fact, deer provide a buffer between the host (white-footed mouse) and humans by “collecting” the ticks on themselves.
According to John Rohm of the Virginia Department of Game & Inland Fisheries, “There is no direct correlation between deer density and prevalence of Lyme disease.? Reducing deer density by X will not = X% reduction in Lyme disease cases.”
He also states that “Deer should not be blamed for the current Lyme disease situation.? Integrated pest management would be more effective than focusing solely on deer.”
One effective alternative to killing deer to decrease Lyme disease is the “4-Poster”: 4-Poster Deer Feed Stations Provide Effective Tick Control
An environmentally friendly deer feeding station developed by the USDA Agricultural Research Service can reduce tick populations by up to 77%, according to a new study.
Ticks can carry diseases that infect humans and animals alike. In the northeastern U.S., the blacklegged tick is a known vector of Lyme disease.
Here is how it works: A deer feeds from a plastic feeding station. The design of the device causes the deer to tilt its head toward the application rollers, ensuring that tickicide is transferred to its head, neck, and ears. The patented feeders, called the “4-Poster” Deer Treatment Bait Station, use four paint rollers to apply tick killer to the deer as they feed on corn placed in the feeding tray.? Tick counts on Gibson Island, Md., showed that the treatment annually achieved at least 77 percent control of several tick species, compared to pretreatment years.
The 4 poster deer stations may be the best alternative to traditional outdoor treatments for ticks, which require the application of pesticides across large areas.
There are numerous 4-poster tick control programs in use throughout the U.S, but Fairfax County continues with redundant studies instead of implementing the proven, effective 4-poster program to protect citizens and reduce tick numbers.

Please let your voices be heard and make sure that our tax money is being used effectively and humanely and that our representatives do their jobs and pay attention to these alternatives instead of ignoring technology, solutions, and concerned residents of Fairfax County.?
Stop the officially sanctioned, inhumane slaughter of deer in Fairfax county

Powered by WordPress. Theme: Motion by 85ideas.